View Full Version : The Northeast
ShadowFox
03-11-2004, 05:40 PM
Does anybody else in the Northeast feel like sucession right now?
Argghhh... we did our part. :(
joule
03-11-2004, 05:41 PM
Does anybody else in the Northeast feel like sucession right now?
Argghhh... we did our part. :(
Yes... ;(
It ain't over yet, though.
oldagerocker
03-11-2004, 05:42 PM
a whole 51% of you did your part and you did it well... :D
ShadowFox
03-11-2004, 05:44 PM
a whole 51% of you did your part and you did it well... :D
What does it matter?
I think the fact that Bush has visited PA over 40 times and still we voted for Kerry says something.
Steve
03-11-2004, 05:55 PM
do you mean "secession"?
joule
03-11-2004, 05:56 PM
do you mean "secession"?
Yeah. :rolleyes: I think he does. :E
Steve
03-11-2004, 05:57 PM
ah ha! well, that makes much more sense now, ya? i'm not in the northeast, but seceding from the union sounds pretty damn nice right now...
ShadowFox
03-11-2004, 05:59 PM
Sorry... but I'm not thinking too straight at the moment.
Steve
03-11-2004, 06:01 PM
oh, i hear ya there. seein' red and thinkin' the bad thoughts, ya?
AudioRage
03-11-2004, 06:03 PM
Hey, think about us west coasters, Look at all the red between us and any other blues. ;(
Steve
03-11-2004, 06:05 PM
hey, i'm smack dab in the middle of a red state that doesn't split it's electoral votes, so my vote doesn't mean a god damned thing. not one thing! how do you think i feel? my voice isn't being heard at all!
AudioRage
03-11-2004, 06:07 PM
Yeah, well, the entire Electoral college idea is just becoming more and more useless.
joule
03-11-2004, 06:07 PM
Yeah, well, the entire Electoral college idea is just becoming more and more useless.
Amen to that.
Steve
03-11-2004, 06:08 PM
fo' sho'. the entire purpose of it is moot. but as long as politicians know it's possible to win the electoral vote without winning the popular vote (i.e. the 2000 election) they probably won't take any steps to reform it, much less abolish it completely.
Lil' Timmy
03-11-2004, 06:14 PM
Hey, think about us west coasters, Look at all the red between us and any other blues. ;(we can probably take ohio and the far northern plains to bridge the gap. i'm sure we could convince the christian conservatives that they'd be better off without us.. give me the westcoast and the northeast over any of the red states anyday. secession indeed, i'm waiting for the titorians to start the shottie militias in my neighborhood.
ShadowFox
03-11-2004, 06:19 PM
The electoral college still has a purpose. Can you imagine the litigation that would occur with a strictly popular vote? It would take months with all of the scumbag lawyers we have in this country.
Oh and Lil'Timmy, I have no idea what your point is.
Lil' Timmy
03-11-2004, 06:22 PM
The electoral college still has a purpose. Can you imagine the litigation that would occur with a strictly popular vote? It would take months with all of the scumbag lawyers we have in this country.
Oh and Lil'Timmy, I have no idea what your point is.the electoral college is archaic and useless. but what point are you referring to? the joke post about titor above? no point, just a joke..
AudioRage
03-11-2004, 06:23 PM
The electoral college still has a purpose. Can you imagine the litigation that would occur with a strictly popular vote? It would take months with all of the scumbag lawyers we have in this country.
Oh and Lil'Timmy, I have no idea what your point is.
Incorrect. How would there be litigation? A vote is vote. And with new voting systems that actually work (not that the other ones didn't california used punch cards too, and I worked two seperate elections and say exactly 0 chads. Ever.) how exactly could they contest the votes? it would be exactly the same as it is now, except the people in states that vote decidedly one way, would actually get a vote that counted.
ShadowFox
03-11-2004, 06:25 PM
I'm in favor of a popular vote election too, I'm just saying it has its problems.
But I don't feel like debating it right now.
Direwolf
03-11-2004, 06:38 PM
Incorrect. How would there be litigation? A vote is vote.
You'd probably be surprised how quickly thinking of that sort goes right out the window. It would never be that simple, no matter how we wished it.
BTW, I'm in the Northeast and I'm not freaking out. Have some perspective.
K e r b e r o s
03-11-2004, 07:45 PM
Oh boy.
Secession. Yes, and people had better do that legally. The last thing I need are rioters blocking me going to work, and damaging the work im trying to goto.
seinfeldrules
03-11-2004, 09:04 PM
By popular vote Bush still wins by 3 million votes.
CptHawkeye
04-11-2004, 03:37 AM
I agree, and was just talking about secession today. Seems to be the best option: the rednecks/idiots get to oppress their own citizens as much as they want, and we can live in relative harmony.
Now, is there any paperwork to get this thing started, or is an armed insurrection our only answer. Cause paperwork would be easier...
Death.Trap
04-11-2004, 03:51 AM
It wouldn't be possible to seceed from the union these days, at least not with any hope of remaining spereate.
seinfeldrules
04-11-2004, 04:09 AM
If it were a popular vote, the canidates would never have need to travel to most parts of the country. They would ignore pretty much everywhere except the cities. Not as good a method as it sounds.
ah ha! well, that makes much more sense now, ya? i'm not in the northeast, but seceding from the union sounds pretty damn nice right now...The south will rise again! :D
shadow6899
06-11-2004, 01:03 AM
well all you gotta do is look at the red states and the blue states to see that secession is already happening. i mean it's civil war all over again, south vs north, only theres a couple more countries now :/ and ya im waiting for the titorians to start up militas round the states :D infact maybe ill be the first :x
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.